Twitter has placed an “unsafe link” warning on a study from the American Heart Association (AHA) which found that mRNA COVID vaccines “dramatically increase” risk of developing heart diseases.
The study entitled “Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning” written by cardiac surgeon Stephen Gundry was published in “Circulation” run by AHA on November 8. It is worth mentioning that the journal “Circulation” is a well-respected publication that was established in 1950 and is rated the world’s number two journal in the “Cardiology and cardiovascular system” category.
If one tries to open an abstract of the study on Twitter, the following pops up:
“Warning: this link may be unsafe
The link you are trying to access has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially spammy or unsafe, in accordance with Twitter’s URL Policy. This link could fall into any of the below categories:
- malicious links that could steal personal information or harm electronic devices
- spammy links that mislead people or disrupt their experience
- violent or misleading content that could lead to real-world harm
- certain categories of content that, if posted directly on Twitter, are a violation of the Twitter Rules.”
While the platform did not specify which of these warranted the label, the content of the scientific study, presumably, contradicts Twitter’s dogmatic rule that prohibits sharing “false or misleading information about COVID-19 which may lead to harm,” including on vaccines’ safety and efficacy. Per Twitter,
“We will label or remove false or misleading information about:
· Adverse impacts or effects of receiving vaccinations, where these claims have been widely debunked;
· Vaccines and vaccination programs which suggest that COVID-19 vaccinations are part of a deliberate or intentional attempt to cause harm or control populations.”
At the same time, Twitter states that while the “knowledge about certain aspects of the pandemic and public response to it (including the development of vaccines) is still relatively nascent,” the platform is “amplifying credible information, and educating the wider community about the prevalence and dynamics of misleading information.”
Apparently, the study published by the AHA belongs to the latter category, per Twitter. As of the date of this publication, the cases of adverse effects following COVID vaccinations cited in the study were not debunked. Neither does the study suggest that such vaccinations are “part of a deliberate or intentional attempt to cause harm or control populations.”
But it actually shows that mRNA-based vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna may lead to serious heart issues.
The researchers led by Dr. Gundry used the PULS Cardiac Test, which is “a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers” that generates a score predicting a person’s five-year risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The study employed 566 participants, aged 28 to 97, with a male-to-female ratio 1:1. The participants had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following their second mRNA shot which were compared with their PULS score drawn three to five months before their COVID shots were administered.
The result of the study showed that mRNA vaccinations “dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium,” which is a single layer of cells that line the interior surface of blood vessels, and lymphatic vessels. The shots also increase T cell infiltration of the heart muscle, meaning the T-cells, which are a type of leukocyte (white blood cell) that is an essential part of the immune system, attack the organ. Overall, the mRNA vaccines increase risk of heart attack from 11% at five years to 25%, with those changes persisting “for at least 2.5 months” post second dose.
All of that “may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination,” per the study’s abstract.
At the end of November, the study got public attention after it was discussed by a world-renowned British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra on GB News.
Dr. Malhotra cited Dr. Gundry’s findings and said he was not the only scientist who found a direct link between the COVID vaccinations and heart disorders. Malhotra stated that British scientists reached similar conclusions, but did not wish to publicize them so as not to lose funding from the pharmaceutical companies.
America’s top health agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admits the mRNA vaccines are associated with increased risk of two types of heart inflammation, myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in young males, but insists that the benefits of the mRNA vaccines outweigh its risks.
Moreover, even if a vaccine recipient develops heart inflammation after the first dose, the agency still recommends proceeding to getting a second dose.
In June, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) added a warning to patient and provider fact sheets for the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines to indicate a “rare risk” of heart inflammation.
As of November 19, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) co-run by the CDC and HHS, showed 9,546 reports of heart attack and 14,428 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis that occurred after the COVID vaccinations, per OpenVAERS.
But please don’t mention any of that on Twitter if you don’t want your posts to be labeled.
