Inventor Jovan Hutton Pulitzer told members of Georgia’s state senate on Wednesday that he successfully hacked into Dominion voting systems being used at Fulton County voting stations, confirming that the machines are connected to the Internet and that they engage in two-way communication.
“At this very moment at a polling location in the county, not only do we have access through the devices to the poll pad–the system, but WE ARE IN,” Pulitzer said, claiming he established a two-way communication from a polling pad in a voting center.
“And it’s not supposed to have WiFi and that’s not supposed to be able to happen so we’ve documented now it’s communicating two ways in real time, meaning it’s receiving data and sending data — should never happen, shouldn’t be WiFi, we’ve now documented it in real time,” Pulitzer said of the Dominion systems, adding, “That’s going on right there where everyone is voting [in the Georgia runoff].”
{modulepos inner_text_ad}
Asked what a bad actor could to with this access, Pulitzer explained:
Statistically, what can be going on when you have an operation like this, is as that data’s being exchanged and somebody’s in it, can actually siphon off that data and modify the data and feed it right back into the system or kind of do a pump-and-dump in real time.… It creates that kind of atmosphere where, not only are you in the system, but then, once you get into the machine, you can do stuff in real time — changing its intent.”
Pulitizer’s findings are in line with those of Colonel Phil Waldron, a cybersecurity expert who spoke at a hearing before Arizona Republican lawmakers last month. During that meeting, Waldron also confirmed that the Dominion machines are connected to the Internet and that experts witnessed Dominion communicating with Frankfurt, Germany, on Election Day.
Said Waldron:
These machines have multiple points of injection that are vulnerable everywhere from the server level — where passwords, accesses are posted for the Dark Web for any hacker to get in and access them. And what they can do at the far, far right limit is download csv files, or like an Excel spreadsheet, change the columns, and re-upload them, and that can be done at the server level. At the operator level, if there’s software, it can be corrupted, it can be manipulated with a device that’s as small and simple as a USB device — which these machines are booted up and run off of.
Georgia, where former Vice President Joe Biden ostensibly leads President Donald Trump by less than 12,000 votes, has been a major battleground as the Trump team makes claims of electoral fraud.
The mainstream media’s convention that there was no significant voter fraud in Georgia or elsewhere in the 2020 race continues in high gear, boosted by recent headlines such as Wednesday reports that a signature audit of more than 15,000 absentee ballot envelopes in one Georgia county found “no fraudulent absentee ballots.”
But suspicions about the establishment’s complicity in the election steal continue, particularly in light of actions such as the recent temporary restraining order by a federal judge against a Republican attempt to purge voter rolls ahead of the January 5 Senate runoffs. The judge in question, Leslie Abrams Gardner, is the sister of Democrat Stacey Abrams, who has led the fight for lax voting rules in the Peach State.
“That a judge would rule on a case brought by a group heavily funded by her sister is very concerning,” said Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who called the ruling a “direct attack on rule of law in Georgia and the integrity of elections in this state.”
Although former Attorney General Bill Barr said prior to stepping down that the DOJ had not unearthed evidence of voter fraud that changed the outcome of the election, Senior Adviser to the Justice Department John Lott has now released a study in which it is stated that over 11,000 Trump votes were subtracted in Fulton County, Georgia, and another 44,000 Trump votes were wiped out in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
President Trump touted the study on Twitter Wednesday.
The election theft is ever more apparent as the evidence mounts, but will even overwhelming proof be sufficient to mount a successful last-minute reversal of Biden’s “win?”
