CDC director Rochelle Walensky said last year that “vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don’t get sick.”
Then she, just recently, got a Covid “vaccine,” contracted the virus, and got sick.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a statement about her situation on Saturday. “Walensky is ‘up to date with her vaccines,’” Politico relates the CDC as saying, “and is experiencing mild symptoms. She is isolating at home, per her agency’s guidance.”
Walensky’s latest genetic-therapy agent (GTA, aka “vaccine”) shot reception was a publicized event, with mask theater and all, as the tweet below evidences.
Many noted the irony of her China virus contraction’s timing. One tweeter, for example, responded to the above with, “This aged as good as raw meat left out in the sun….”
Left-wing “fact-checking” outfit Poynter was quick to address such mockery, writing on Saturday that “while vaccine deniers will smirk at her being infected, they miss the point that her symptoms are mild. That is what the vaccine is supposed to do in 2022.”
That’s interesting, because you know who else had mild symptoms? My mother. She tested positive for Covid approximately two months ago and is unvaccinated.
Oh, she’s also 93 — right at an age where the China virus is supposed to be most deadly.
One more thing: I’d taken my mother for the testing and thus was in the same car with her. And since she was scared and didn’t want to be alone, I spent the whole day and evening with her at her home. Not wanting to treat her like a leper, I just figured, “Okay, so I’ll get Covid. I have ivermectin, anyway, and I’m pretty confident I’ll be fine.” She was coughing intermittently, too, and we weren’t exactly meticulous about social distancing. And guess what?
I tested negative for coronavirus twice during the next two weeks and never had any symptoms.
So maybe Poynter is missing the point (and perhaps wants to). To wit: The current China virus variant(s) is/are not as deadly as the original strain, so most people have mild to no symptoms.
Oh, Poynter added, unwittingly helping to make the GTA realists’ (not “deniers’”) point, that “Dr. Anthony Fauci, the face of America’s pandemic response, and U.S. Health Secretary Xavier Becerra both tested positive in June.”
Putting this in further perspective is Vinay Prasad, M.D., a professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of California San Francisco, who is described as “an expert on randomized studies.” Writing at Substack Saturday, he addressed Walensky’s latest GTA shot:
Right now she’s probably in the window where the booster exerts the greatest protective effect it could possibly exert, yet still: look what happened.
If you ask the CDC director, “What is the vaccine efficacy of the bivalent booster you have received? What is it for any symptomatic disease? What is it for severe disease?” She won’t be able to answer.
That’s because the leadership at the White House has permitted this product to come to the US market without any credible evidence that it has any vaccine effectiveness.
…It will be hard for the American people to reconcile Rochelle Walensky’s insistance [sic] that everyone rush to boost their 7-year-old, a decision she encourages, with her living proof that this vaccine cannot stop breakthrough infection.
(Hat tip: American Thinker.)
Of course, people are increasingly coming to realize the GTAs do more harm than good. In fact, a prominent double-vaxxed British cardiologist who once pushed the GTAs, but whose father died of a presumably GTA-induced heart attack this summer, is now calling for a halt to the drugs’ administration.
What’s more, that physician, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, finds it hard to believe that Pfizer executives and scientists didn’t know about the GTAs’ dangers because, he said, “they have access to the raw data, which we now know shows significant harm.” Given this, is it plausible believing that none of our public officials — not even our doctors in government — knew about this harm? And if some did, why assume they’re actually taking a GTA when claiming to do so, as opposed to doing Covid theater and getting a placebo? Note here that Anthony Fauci himself admitted last year that up to 50 percent of CDC and National Institutes of Health employees had not taken the GTAs.
This isn’t to say that no officials have taken them, only that with lying being the government norm (especially with Covid) — with, for example, politicians touting mask use and China-virus restrictions but then being discovered violating their own prescriptions — none of this can be taken at face value.
As to this, consider Walensky’s behavior (video below) when making the aforementioned claim that “vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don’t get sick.” What might a body language expert say about it?
At the video’s opening, Walensky incongruously raises her eyebrows a few times. Now consider that Learning Mind informs, “When someone lies, they generally raise the eyebrows in a subconscious attempt of conveying openness.” She also was stammering somewhat and seemed nervous (though that could be attributed to simply being a poor speaker). Her presentation doesn’t smack of sincerity.
Regardless, the bottom line is, would you buy a used “vaccine” from these people? For we have learned that we can trust only one thing about our health authorities — that they will not tell the truth.
