There are numerous “experts” who insist that Joe Biden’s victory in the November 2020 election is unquestionable. We are all supposed to accept, reluctantly and without question, that Biden was the winner and his victory should not be challenged in any way. But the evidence of fraud continues to pile up; and it shows that Donald Trump was 2020’s winner.
Consider the findings of Peter Navarro. He earned a Ph.D. in economics from Harvard University and taught at the University of California-Irvine for more than 20 years. His background would seem to place him in the camp of Biden supporters, like so many with similar credentials. But he has never been a go-along-with-the-crowd liberal. Named as President Trump’s director of the National Trade Council, he became somewhat notorious for publicly chiding Dr. Anthony Fauci’s on-again-off-again attitude regarding the value of face masks and methods of combating the COVID epidemic.
{modulepos inner_text_ad}
After the proclamation of a Biden victory, Navarro decided to look into the vote counts in the “swing” states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona. He found more than 20 types of voting irregularities, including ballot mishandling, processing foul-ups, voting machine unreliability, violation of the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, and more.
Based on more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony of state officials, analysis by think tanks and legal centers, scrutiny of videos and photos, and comments rendered by the public, he concluded that Donald Trump had earned more Electoral College votes than Joseph Biden, enough for Trump to have been declared 2020’s winner. Not content with his initial report entitled Immaculate Deception, he continued examining the results of the recent election and has issued two supplemental reports, one labeled The Art of the Steal (Volume 2) and the other his 14-page summary entitled Yes, President Trump Won (Volume 3). In the latter, his 52 footnotes identify the actual sources of the information he relied on for his conclusions about what actually occurred in the six states named above.
According to Dr. Navarro, there was no single “silver bullet” used to illegitimately award the presidency to Joseph Biden. Instead, he claims, there was “death by a thousand irregularities.” It was some of these moves in the each of the six states that provided “enough un-scrutinized and potentially illegal absentee and mail-in ballots to turn a decisive Trump victory to a narrow and potentially illegitimate alleged victory by Joe Biden.”
The Harvard-trained economist listed 26 categories of “Vote Irregularities and Illegalities,” some of which were employed in each of the six states. While all of the 26 questionable anomalies weren’t obvious, he discovered highly questionable reporting of vote results in such categories as flawed absentee ballots, non-citizen voters, out-of state voters, juvenile voters, dead voters, voting machine irregularities, and more. In Pennsylvania alone, he pointed to 992,467 “possible illegal votes” for Biden — far beyond the number needed to have that state’s Electoral College votes awarded to Trump.
In Georgia, Navarro’s investigation came up with 601,130 questionable votes awarded to Biden, enough to have its Electoral College votes unjustly awarded to the Delaware Democrat. In each of the swing states, the number of “possible illegal votes” for Biden was enough to have him declared the victor and Trump the loser. Navarro’s data led him to claim the direct opposite result. He concludes, “Yes, President Trump won.”
Journalist Deroy Murdock Reaches Similar Conclusion
In addition to Peter Navarro’s compelling report, investigative journalist Deroy Murdock conducted his own comprehensive six-week examination of the voting results in the six “swing” states. A political commentator and contributing editor to National Review Online, Murdock (not related to media mogul Rupert Murdoch) concluded similarly that there are more-than-enough fraudulent ballots in each of the swing states to reverse the Biden win and have Trump declared the victor.
In Pennsylvania, for instance, Murdock found 99,722 highly questionable votes for Biden that ordinarily would have been declared invalid. These were easily enough to have Trump win the state. He also found an official letter signed in mid-December by 19 members of that state’s Senate pointing to 202,377 more ballots cast for president than there were voters who voted. In Georgia, he discovered 460,000 ballots that should have been labeled unacceptable under the state’s laws and discarded. In Michigan, 27,825 ballots were requested using the names of persons who had made no such requests. Also in Michigan, 174,384 ballots that did not have required voter registration numbers were counted but should have been discarded. Highly questionable ballots were counted in Nevada, Wisconsin, and Arizona. In some states, ballot counting was suspended in the wee hours and, when the counting was resumed, a huge number of votes had surprisingly been added to the Biden column with only a tiny number designated for Trump. Such a criminal tactic had always been labeled “Ballot Stuffing,” but it was allowed in 2020.
All of these anomalies — and many more not mentioned above — added up to a win for Biden. Had they not appeared, Trump’s total in the Electoral College would have exceeded Biden’s and he would have been declared a reelected president.
Mass Media Guilty of Promoting Immense Fraud
Information such as what appears above should have been reported nationally. But it appeared in only a fraction of small circulation print and electronic outlets. The problem, therefore, is larger than corruption in the voting and counting processes. Political forces that already dominate the print and electronic media have acquired great power and are partnering with their favored politicians to select who will win elections, even elections at the highest national level. The need therefore is for citizens to obtain information about vitally important matters from sources not connected to the corrupt purveyors of news and perspective.
Undoing the Biden “victory” is extremely unlikely. Preparing for the 2022 congressional elections and the 2024 presidential contest must start immediately. The much-needed turnabout can be achieved but only through a more realistically aware and better informed voting public.
