When up against an enemy as seemingly powerful as the globalist cabal, those on the side of freedom are likely to experience several setbacks and disappointments, and this has the consequence of leading the disappointed and frustrated into a state of ideological confusion, in which they clasp at any ideology which seems to offer them a solution — even if it is expressly in opposition to their original political principles.
This form of radicalization is actually clever maneuvering by the Deep State, which is more than happy to foment the phenomenon in order to lead the constitutionalist, Americanist movement astray.
One of the ways this phenomenon has played out in recent years is the way in which many on the Right are being discreetly pulled to the left — at least on economic issues.
This shifting is understandable: First, right-wingers become “redpilled,” discovering that the gradual destruction of their civilization is not the result of random happenstance or misguided ignorance, but the deliberate, coordinated scheme of a cadre of wealthy global oligarchs who are anti-American and anti-Christian.
Once they realize this, the redpilled right-wingers begin to think along these lines: “If the real bad guys are the super wealthy elites, then the answer is to eat the rich.”
In other words, these rightists unwittingly fall into Marxist class-warfare ideology. Some do so completely unabashedly; I’ve come across posts by right-leaning young people who praise Joseph Stalin as some sort of right-wing hero.
Again, this is ultimately nothing more than a psy-op, a tactic for bringing well-meaning right-wingers, through frustration and disillusionment, full-circle to Marxism.
The reality is that what we face is not really a case of class warfare, though you can see why someone would be tempted to believe so, given that it is largely members of the uber-rich social strata who are currently the primary drivers of the anti-American conspiracy.
But, at the end of the day, this is really a question of good versus evil, Christianity versus satanism, nationalism versus globalism, and liberty versus tyranny. Those are the true demarcations of this fight. And those dividing lines have nothing to do with class — they transcend class.
Contrary to what the Marxists and misguided right-wingers believe, the wealthy are not inherently evil or proponents of wickedness. As I have emphasized in previous articles, America’s founding and independence from Great Britain was, in fact, only possible because of the wealthy. That is, the “aristocracy” of the founding generation were the main leaders orchestrating the cause of liberty. George Washington, for example, came from a wealthy family and had a net worth equivalent to over half a billion dollars in today’s currency.
The reason the “elite” in American have disproportionately become agents of the globalist-Marxist conspiracy is because the cabal has implemented a deliberate effort to infiltrate them and pull them over to its side, knowing that the money and resources of the wealthy make them useful instruments for furthering the anti-freedom, anti-Christian cause.
One of the ways the cabal has accomplished this has been by taking over the universities, where it corrupts the children of the wealthy, who go on to become national leaders of industry, academia, and politics. College secret societies such as Yale’s Skull & Bones are an example of globalist fifth columns embedded in prestigious institutions for the specific purpose of making converts out of tomorrow’s leaders. All of this is well documented in the book To the Victor Go the Myths & Monuments, by John Birch Society CEO Emeritus Art Thompson.
The point is that wealth and social status do not make someone inherently good or evil. Such an assertion is Marxist thinking — in the same way that cultural Marxism claims nonwhites are inherently good while whites are inherently evil, or that women and homosexuals are good while straight Christian men are bad.
As we have seen, America’s natural gentry was once a force for good, even if it has largely been infiltrated and subverted today. But that doesn’t mean others aren’t as susceptible to corruption. After all, the Democratic Party today largely appeals to the poor and has thus made them accomplices of the Left’s tyrannical, satanic agenda. If the super-wealthy of today are accomplices of the cabal, then so, arguably, are the extreme poor.
The fact that not only individuals, but social groups can be converged and corrupted and thus become instruments of tyranny is one reason why the Framers wisely created a republican system blending elements of the governmental systems of democracy, aristocracy, and monarchy.
For democracy is rule by the people, or, in socio-economic terms, rule by the poor. Aristocracy is rule by the elites, or, in socio-economic terms, rule by the rich (although we can make the argument that there are levels of aristocracy, which can include rule by the middle class — the type of system that existed for a time in the Medieval Italian city-state of Florence). And monarchy is rule by the one, the monarch; or, in socio-economic terms, rule by the uber-wealthy — the society’s natural “royalty.”
A healthy society has all of these social elements working together in peace and cooperation, which is why the Constitution has elements of democracy, aristocracy, and monarchy — so that all the social strata are represented. But Marxism sows discord by pitting them all against each other.
The answer to the subversion by the globalist cabal is not to succumb to the divided thinking of Marxism, but to restore the proper social equilibrium through a return to republican principles (rather than the extremes of democracy on one hand and oligarchy on the other hand) and through the judicious purging of our institutions to root out the globalist influence.
